Jiang Jiaqi (Moscow). Deng Xiaoping as an Iconic Figure in the Formation of China’s Image as a Country of Reform, Openness and Investment Attractiveness

Препринт

Abstract. This article examines Deng Xiaoping as an iconic political figure whose public image contributed to the formation of China’s international image as a country of reform, openness and investment attractiveness. The study considers a national image not only as a result of economic growth or official diplomacy, but also as a symbolic construction in which certain personalities embody historical change. Deng’s image is analysed through three dimensions: pragmatic modernization, the policy of reform and opening-up, and the regional symbolism of special economic zones, especially Shenzhen. The article argues that Deng functioned as a symbolic bridge between socialist continuity and market-oriented modernization. His image helped foreign audiences perceive China not merely as a closed socialist state, but as a pragmatic and increasingly predictable space for trade, investment and cooperation. At the same time, the article avoids reducing China’s transformation to one leader and treats iconic leadership as a way of communicating broader institutional and historical processes. The research is relevant for image studies because it shows how a political biography can become a reputational resource for a state and its regions.

Keywords: Deng Xiaoping, iconic figure, China, national image, reform and opening-up, investment attractiveness, modernization, Shenzhen, soft power.

Цзян Цзяци (г. Москва). Дэн Сяопин как знаковая фигура в формировании имиджа Китая как страны реформ, открытости и инвестиционной привлекательности

Аннотация. В статье рассматривается Дэн Сяопин как знаковая политическая фигура, публичный образ которой способствовал формированию международного имиджа Китая как страны реформ, открытости и инвестиционной привлекательности. Имидж государства понимается не только как результат экономического роста или официальной дипломатии, но и как символическая конструкция, в которой отдельные личности воплощают исторические изменения. Образ Дэна анализируется в трех измерениях: прагматическая модернизация, политика реформ и открытости, а также региональная символика специальных экономических зон, прежде всего Шэньчжэня. Делается вывод, что Дэн выступил символическим посредником между социалистической преемственностью и рыночно ориентированной модернизацией. Его образ помог внешним аудиториям воспринимать Китай не как закрытое социалистическое государство, а как прагматичное и все более предсказуемое пространство для торговли, инвестиций и сотрудничества. Актуальность исследования связана с тем, что политическая биография может становиться репутационным ресурсом государства и его регионов. Такой подход позволяет увидеть связь между лидерством, территориальным развитием и внешним восприятием страны.

Ключевые слова: Дэн Сяопин, знаковая фигура, Китай, национальный имидж, реформы и открытость, инвестиционная привлекательность, модернизация, Шэньчжэнь, мягкая сила.

 

Introduction

The image of a country is formed through a complex interaction of history, political communication, cultural memory, economic performance and the expectations of external audiences. In this process, some personalities acquire a meaning that exceeds their official positions. They become iconic figures because their public image makes broader changes visible and understandable. Such figures do not replace institutions or social forces, but they provide a human and symbolic form to transformations that would otherwise remain abstract.

Deng Xiaoping occupies this position in the international perception of modern China. His name is connected with the beginning of the policy of reform and opening-up, with the gradual transformation of China from a relatively closed planned economy into a major participant in global economic relations, and with the rise of China as an attractive space for foreign trade and investment [1; 2]. While Mao Zedong was associated abroad with revolution and ideological mobilization, Deng increasingly came to represent pragmatism, modernization and controlled openness.

The relevance of this topic lies in the fact that national image has become an important element of international relations. States compete not only through material resources, but also through reputation, trust, attractiveness and the ability to present their development model convincingly. For investors and foreign partners, the image of stability and predictability may be as important as formal legal rules. The purpose of this article is to analyze Deng Xiaoping as an iconic figure in the formation of China’s image as a country of reform, openness and investment attractiveness. The article focuses on three dimensions: the symbolic meaning of Deng’s pragmatic modernization, the international image effect of reform and opening-up, and the regional symbolism of Shenzhen and the special economic zones.

1. Iconic figures and national image

An iconic figure may be understood as a person whose public image becomes a symbol of wider historical, cultural or political meanings. In the field of country and regional image studies, such figures are important because they simplify complex processes and make them communicable. A state may possess many institutions, traditions and strategies, but external audiences often remember it through names, faces and stories. Political leaders, artists, scientists and entrepreneurs may therefore become symbols of reform, resistance, modernization or cultural prestige.

The image of a state is not a purely objective reflection of its material condition. It is constructed through narratives, media representations, diplomatic discourse, public memory and academic interpretation [3]. Place branding and country reputation studies show that countries are evaluated through both rational and emotional associations: stability, innovation, culture, leadership, security and opportunity [4]. Iconic figures operate at the intersection of these associations. They make national narratives more concrete.

At the same time, it is necessary to avoid excessive personalization. No leader alone forms the image of a country. Economic growth, institutions, regional development, legal reforms and international circumstances are decisive. However, an iconic figure can condense these processes into a recognizable symbol. Deng Xiaoping is significant precisely in this sense. His image is not limited to a biography of a Chinese leader. It functions as a symbolic formula of the post-1978 transformation: reform without total rupture, opening without loss of political continuity, and modernization through gradual experimentation [1; 5].

2. Deng Xiaoping and the image of pragmatic modernization

The central element of Deng Xiaoping’s image is pragmatism. In Chinese and international discussions, he is associated with the idea that development should be guided by practical results rather than rigid ideological formulas. This image was important for China’s external reputation after 1978. Before the reform period, China was often perceived abroad as a revolutionary socialist state, relatively closed to foreign capital and heavily defined by ideology. Deng’s leadership helped change this perception by shifting emphasis from revolutionary mobilization to development, modernization and economic cooperation [2; 6].

The symbolic strength of Deng’s image came from the combination of continuity and change. He did not present reform as the abandonment of China’s political identity. Instead, reform was explained as a practical path to national modernization. For foreign observers, this mattered because the credibility of opening depends not only on laws or individual policies, but also on whether the political leadership appears committed to a long-term direction. Deng’s image helped to communicate that opening-up was not a temporary concession, but a durable national strategy.

This image also affected investment perception. Investors usually evaluate market size, labor resources and infrastructure, but they also assess political will and policy predictability. Deng became associated with a style of leadership that permitted controlled experimentation, gradual expansion of market mechanisms and selective use of foreign experience [7]. As a result, China could be imagined not as a state of chaotic transition, but as a country attempting to combine political stability with economic transformation. This became one of the foundations of China’s investment attractiveness.

3. Reform and opening-up as an image-making process

The policy of reform and opening-up launched in the late 1970s was not only an economic program. It was also a message to the world. China signaled that it was ready to participate more actively in international trade, accept foreign investment, learn from external experience and integrate into global economic relations [8]. This changed the vocabulary through which China was described. Instead of being viewed mainly through ideological categories, China increasingly came to be discussed as an emerging market, a manufacturing base and a long-term development project.

The special economic zones played a crucial role in this transformation. Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou and Xiamen became experimental spaces where China tested new forms of economic governance and foreign investment. Their importance was not only administrative or economic. They became visible symbols of a changing China. The development of Shenzhen was especially powerful because it demonstrated that a border area could be transformed into an internationally connected urban and industrial center [2; 7].

Deng’s image was closely connected with these regional experiments. His support for special economic zones and his later symbolic association with the southern tour strengthened the impression that China’s reform direction had top-level political backing [1]. In this way, the image of a leader, the image of a region and the image of a country reinforced each other. Deng symbolized reform; Shenzhen visualized reform; China as a whole began to be perceived as a country of opportunity.

This process shows that national image is often built through specific territories. Foreign investors do not encounter an abstract country; they enter concrete cities, ports, zones and industries. Special economic zones translated the national narrative of openness into visible spaces. They made the reform message credible because it could be observed in infrastructure, production, export activity and administrative experimentation.

4. Investment attractiveness and symbolic credibility

Investment attractiveness is usually described in terms of market conditions, legal guarantees, infrastructure and economic growth. These factors are necessary, but they do not exhaust the problem. The decision to invest also depends on expectations about the future. A country becomes attractive when external actors believe that its development strategy is credible and sufficiently stable. Iconic figures can influence this perception by symbolizing commitment to a particular historical path.

Deng Xiaoping’s image contributed to China’s investment attractiveness in several ways. First, he represented political commitment to opening. Foreign capital requires a signal that participation in the domestic economy is not merely tolerated, but strategically welcomed. Second, Deng symbolized experimentation. The gradual approach to reform suggested that China could test new rules and adjust them according to practical needs [6; 7]. Third, Deng’s image was connected with development-oriented legitimacy: the central promise of reform was modernization and improvement of living standards.

This symbolic credibility helped foreign observers interpret China’s transformation as a long-term process. The Chinese market was large, but market size alone was not enough. The key question was whether China would remain open and whether reform would continue. Deng’s public image gave a personal and political form to the answer. He made China’s turn toward development and foreign economic cooperation more intelligible to the outside world.

At the same time, investment attractiveness created by national image is always fragile. It depends on continuing policy performance, institutional adaptation and international conditions. Deng’s image could open a narrative of trust, but it could not replace legal institutions or economic governance. Therefore, the most accurate interpretation is that Deng functioned as a symbolic amplifier of structural change. His role was to make China’s reform direction readable and credible.

5. Soft power, memory and the limits of personalization

Deng Xiaoping’s image also belongs to the field of soft power. Soft power is often linked to culture, values and foreign policy, but developmental success may also become attractive [9]. For many external observers, Deng represents the possibility of modernization through gradual reform, economic openness and strategic adaptation. This narrative has been influential not only in China’s self-presentation, but also in discussions among developing countries searching for models of growth that preserve sovereignty while engaging with globalization.

However, the image of Deng is not one-dimensional. Like any iconic political figure, he is interpreted differently by different audiences. Some emphasize economic modernization, poverty reduction and openness; others point to the political tensions and contradictions of the reform era. A scholarly approach should recognize that iconic images are selective and contested. Their power lies not in offering a full historical account, but in organizing memory and perception around a limited set of associations.

The limits of personalization are especially important in the Chinese case. Reform and opening-up were implemented by many actors: central and local officials, workers, entrepreneurs, foreign investors, regional governments and international partners. Globalization, changes in production chains and shifts in the international environment also mattered [5; 10]. Deng did not create China’s transformation alone. Rather, his public image became the symbolic form through which this transformation was narrated.

This is why Deng remains relevant in the study of national and regional image. His figure connects biography with national strategy and links political memory with economic reputation. Even today, discussions of China’s development often return to the vocabulary associated with Deng: reform, opening, pragmatism, modernization and experimentation. These words continue to influence the way China is remembered and evaluated internationally.

Conclusion

Deng Xiaoping can be understood as an iconic figure in the formation of China’s image as a country of reform, openness and investment attractiveness. His importance lies not only in his political role, but also in the symbolic meaning attached to his image. Through Deng, the abstract processes of modernization and opening-up acquired a recognizable human form.

The article has shown that Deng’s image contributed to China’s international reputation in several interconnected ways. He symbolized pragmatic modernization and a shift away from rigid ideological isolation. He became associated with the institutional and territorial practices of reform, especially the creation of special economic zones. He helped communicate China’s commitment to foreign economic cooperation and investment attraction. Finally, he provided a link between national transformation and regional symbolism, particularly in the case of Shenzhen.

At the same time, Deng’s role should not be interpreted as the sole cause of China’s rise. Iconic figures do not replace institutions, social forces or international conditions. They condense them into symbolic form. The case of Deng Xiaoping demonstrates that public personalities can play an important communicative role in the construction of country and regional images. In China’s case, his image helped shift external perceptions from closure to openness, from ideological rigidity to pragmatism, and from isolation to investment opportunity. This symbolic transformation remains a central element of China’s modern international image.

Bibliographic List

1. Vogel E.F. Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011. 876 p.
2. Naughton B. The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007. 528 p.
3. Anholt S. Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 134 p.
4. Kotler P., Gertner D. Country as Brand, Product, and Beyond: A Place Marketing and Brand Management Perspective // Journal of Brand Management. 2002. Vol. 9, No. 4. P. 249-261. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076
5. Brandt L., Rawski T.G. China’s Great Economic Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 905 p.
6. Harding H. China’s Second Revolution: Reform after Mao. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1987. 380 p.
7. Coase R., Wang N. How China Became Capitalist. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 256 p.
8. State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. China and the World Trade Organization. Beijing, 2018 // ENGLISH.GOV.CN [website]. URL: http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2018/06/28/content_281476201898696.htm (accessed: 15.06.2026).
9. Nye J.S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: PublicAffairs, 2004. 191 p.
10. World Bank. China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative Society. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2013. 442 p. URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/781101468239669951/china-2030-building-a-modern-harmonious-and-creative-society (accessed: 15.06.2026).